The importance of speech in the context of Buddhist ethics is obvious:
words can break or save lives, make enemies or friends, start war or create peace.

Buddha explained right speech as follows:

1. to abstain from false speech, especially not to tell deliberate lies
2. to abstain from slanderous speech and not to use words against others
3. to abstain from harsh words that offend or hurt others
4. to abstain from idle chatter that lacks purpose or depth.

 
   
1 of 2
1
Self-Enlightenment
Posted: August 28 2007 01:35 PM   [ Ignore ]
Rank: Jr. Member
Shi Yan Cheng's Avatar
Jr. MemberJr. MemberJr. Member
Total Posts:  16
Germany
Member is from Germany
Joined on: 2007-08-12

Chan-Pracise of Dao Jun Seng Tuan

Self-Enlightenment

Meditation does not know an aim, which is determined by a self-centred intention; no I will, I can, I shall, I may also no hidden aim like: it will, can, shall, may. Meditation goes together with the realization of the law of arising and passing away. Meditation imparts the combining of vitality and getting conscious by attention.

Who is looking for silence doesn’t die, but his organism becomes numb, that means in the motorial motion. This paralysed state is combined with a growing sense of well-being and a dwindling consciousness.

Vitality and getting conscious always looking for equalization balance not for the middle. The middle is fiction, comes from static thinking and is a darkening symbolization by a an abstract will to fix. The middle path is the dynamic Continuum of a clear conscious thinking, speaking acting, it is concentration of vitality which causes calm. Silence is immobility, calm balance of the game of forces. In the last phase of meditation remains force, light, shining and a perfect not confused getting conscious of the law of so-and-no-different-being in the dynamics of life.

The self experience remains in perfect clearness, security, calm and force like (getting) self-consciousness. But because the big dimming of consciousness-clearness, the thinking became still, the aimlessness does not afflict the sentiment. Getting conscious has it’s aim and it is its aim itself: the self experience.

You can not exercise meditation, you can only live it. Exercised meditation makes nervous, lived meditation makes dynamic, powerful, calm, perfect calm with a reliable development of energy in everyday life. Exercised meditation has to make nervous, because it is self-centred and the evolution is blocked.

Self experience is not I-am-thinking. I-am-thinking is madness, an unlimited madness which leads to the mania for always being in the right. Thereby vitality literatim becomes dismembered ground, shattered, split before the achievement of evolution-maturities.

Self experience does not exclude logical thinking, but demands it. I-am-thinking can not be logical, because it puts the wrong premise that is “am”, that means static’s and with that each conclusion must be a priori wrong. To become, that means dynamics. To become is characteristic of thinking and therefore it is aimless. A clear conscious self experience is a symbol, that means a term of certainty: to be is (not I am). I-am-thinking is a symbol of uncertainty: “Am I?” with the ocean of unanswerable questions of doubt, decisions and actions. Who “I” am, no one can say.

Meditation can not be classified. It is a phase of human evolution like the breaking of the voice of a boy. When it is reached, depends on the whole life style. Logical, clear, objective, recognizing and understanding thinking is supposition. Without logic in the strict sense of causality no cognition is possible and without cognition no mind, no character, no attitude, no control of dynamics. Only logical thinking and acting has been run over by dynamics of life, urges into the field of emotions and into lethargical exhaustion.

Meditation is most powerful brain work, which knows no break, except sleep. Meditation is the clock of timelessness, use without wanted to be a clock-maker. It never fails. Meditation is a life-clock without clock-face.

In and out of Dharma, Xue Feng (Shi Yan Cheng)


Translation from Dr. Mao Qingquan

道峻僧团的参禅实践

自省

坐禅冥想的目的决不是由我之所愿所确定的,它不是我愿、我能、我必须、我应该和我可以做什么;坐禅冥想也不是隐藏的目的,诸如:情况要、可以、必须、应该、容许怎么办。坐禅冥想是和对生长消亡规律性的认识相伴而行的。通过注意力的专注,坐禅冥想促进活力和意识过程两者的结合。

寻求静止的人不会死亡,但从外表上看,其机体会僵化,意即其自主运动功能会僵化。这种僵化是和不断加强的舒适感以及不断消失的明确意识相联系的。

活力和意识过程不断地寻求平衡, 而不是寻求中间点。中间点是源自于静态思维的虚构,是概念上的固定企图所致的遮掩性象征化表达。中间道路是明确思维、言谈和举止的动态连续体,是导致宁静而不是导致静止的活力聚集。停止是无运动的状态,而宁静则是各种力量共同作用的和谐平衡。在坐禅冥想的末期,留下的是力量、光明、彻悟,留下的是对生命动力规律性的完完全全的、一清二楚的明确意识,即生命动力就是这样而别无其它可能。

作为自我意识的自我体验在完全的明确、可靠、宁静和力量中得以保留。但由于可以使得意识从清晰变为模糊的思维已经停止,思维的无目的性也不会对感觉造成困扰。这是因为意识有其目的,并且就是其目的本身:体验自我。

人们不能练习参禅冥想,而只能有意识地去体验。训练的参禅冥想使人紧张,而体验的参禅冥想却使人变得有活力而充满力量,在日常生活中精力充沛的同时保持完全的宁静。训练的参禅冥想注定要使人紧张,因为它以自我为中心,从而阻止了渐变。

自我体验不等于我是思维。我是思维是极度愚蠢的,这种思维势比造成自以为是,并由此而实实在在地消磨、吞噬、粉碎和撕裂对渐进的获取。

自我体验不排除逻辑思维,而是要求逻辑思维。由于我是思维的错误前提是静态的“是”,故由此得出的每一结论从头就是错误的。过程,也就是说动态,是思维的特征,所以过程是无目的的。明确意识的自我体验是一种象征,亦即明确的概念:存在(而不是:我是)。我是思维是不明确性概念的象征:浩如烟海的疑问、决定和行为中的“我是不是?”。对我“是”谁这个问题,没人能够回答。

对坐禅冥想不能进行分类。就象男孩发育期的声变一样,坐禅冥想是人渐进中的一个时期。什么时候到达这一时期,取决于一个人的整体生活方式,必要前提是合乎逻辑的、明确的、客观的、有识别和理解能力的思维。没有在严格意义上讲的因果关系逻辑,就谈不上认知;没有认知,就谈不上思想品质、性格、态度以及对活力的控制。逻辑思维和行为将被生活的活力所淹没,并由此受到情感的制约而冷漠衰竭。

坐禅冥想是除了睡眠之外,一刻也不停顿的强力脑力劳动。坐禅冥想是永恒的钟表,使用它,而不必去当钟表匠。它永不停歇。坐禅冥想是一个没有表盘的生命之钟。

雪峰 (释延承)

 Signature 

无 恒 久 存 在 - 非 始 亦 非 终  - 如 我 所 见 者  - 非 生 亦 非 灭

Profile
 
 
Posted: August 29 2007 04:35 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Rank: Moderator
Lobsan Payat's Avatar
ModeratorModeratorModeratorModeratorModerator
Total Posts:  100
India
Member is from India
Joined on: 2006-05-09

Namaste Dharma brother.

From my favourite Searching the Noble Truth Sutra (chin.: luómójīng 罗摩经)

This Dharma that I have attained is deep, hard to see, hard to realize, peaceful, refined, beyond the scope of conjecture, subtle, to-be-experienced by the wise. But this generation delights in attachment, is excited by attachment, enjoys attachment. For a generation delighting in attachment, excited by attachment, enjoying attachment, this/that conditionality & dependent co-arising are hard to see. This state, too, is hard to see: the resolution of all fabrications, the relinquishment of all acquisitions, the ending of craving; dispassion; cessation; Unbinding. And if I were to teach the Dharma and others would not understand me that would be tiresome for me, troublesome for me.’

“Just then these verses, unspoken in the past, unheard before, occurred to me:

‘Enough now with teaching
  what
  only with difficulty
  I reached.
This Dharma is not easily realized
by those overcome
with aversion & passion.
What is abstruse, subtle,
  deep,
  hard to see,
going against the flow—
those delighting in passion,
cloaked in the mass of darkness,
  won’t see.’

“As I reflected thus, my mind inclined to dwelling at ease, not to teaching the Dharma.

Self-enlightenment or awakening is the intuitive apprehension of the ultimate truth that all phenomena are in the ultimate sense are devoid or empty of the illusive Self or Ego. When this Self or Ego is annihilated, human character is perfected. With the gradual curtailment of Self and Ego parallel with the development of wisdom, one becomes less selfish, less angry and less deluded.

_/\_

 Signature 

It is important to bear in mind that one must not be attached to rituals, words or even Chan sitting.  True Chan means to cut off all thinking and to keep non-moving mind.  True Chan means to become clear.

Profile
 
 
Posted: August 29 2007 05:00 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Rank: Sr. Member
Yan Kong's Avatar
Sr. MemberSr. MemberSr. MemberSr. MemberSr. Member
Total Posts:  93
Joined on: 2006-03-16

Namo Amituofo brothers.

I wish to share a little story with you.

Once Chan Master To An was visiting another temple.  He was not wearing his Chan Master clothes, but just the clothes of a wandering monk.  He began a conversation with one of the monks at the temple, who did not recognize him.  Soon the monk began to talk about his Master.  “Everyday he does one thousand prostrations.  He eats only one meal a day.  He hasn’t left the temple for thirty years.  He is always sitting Chan.  He is the greatest Chan Master in all of China.”

To An replied, “Well, well, he sounds like an extraordinary man.  I can’t do any of these things.  I can’t bow a thousand times a day; but my mind is never lazy.  I can’t eat only once a day; but I never desire food.  I can’t stay in a temple for more than a short time; but wherever I go I have no hindrance.  I can’t sit Chan for very long; but I never give rise to thinking.”

The monk said, “I don’t understand.”  “Then go ask your Master,” To An replied.  The monk bowed and went into the temple.

Soon the Chan Master of the temple came running out to To An and prostrated himself three times in front of him.  “You are a great Chan Master,” he said. “Please let me become your disciple.  I have been very attached to hard training.  But now that I have heard your words, my mind is clear.”

To An laughed and said, “No, I can’t be your teacher.  You are already a great Chan Master.  All you need to do is to keep the mind you had when you were bowing to me.  Already you are a free man.  Before, you were bowing, sitting and eating only for yourself.  Now it is for all people.”

_/_

 Signature 

Buddhism is the hardest thing to learn in Shaolin

Profile
 
 
Posted: September 04 2007 12:46 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]
Rank: Sr. Member
ShaoYu's Avatar
Sr. MemberSr. MemberSr. MemberSr. MemberSr. Member
Total Posts:  119
Greece
Member is from Greece
Joined on: 2006-05-23

Master Yan Kong, be well for sharing this story with us.
There are so simple and contemporaneously so enlightening words.

Namo Amituofo _/o\_

 Signature 

I really hope some day to find Enlightment

Profile
 
 
Posted: September 26 2007 04:47 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]
Rank: Moderator
Lobsan Payat's Avatar
ModeratorModeratorModeratorModeratorModerator
Total Posts:  100
India
Member is from India
Joined on: 2006-05-09

“What others do and do not do is not my concern,” said the Buddha. “What I do and do not do - that is my concern.”

Namaste all.

A Chan abbot went dressed in rags to the door of a rich man and was turned away with an empty bowl. So he returned in his formal robe of office and was invited in and served a sumptuous meal. Removing his robe and folding it, he placed it on front of the feast and departed with the words, “This meal is not for me; it is for the robe.”

 Signature 

It is important to bear in mind that one must not be attached to rituals, words or even Chan sitting.  True Chan means to cut off all thinking and to keep non-moving mind.  True Chan means to become clear.

Profile
 
 
Posted: March 03 2010 08:33 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 5 ]
Rank: Member
MemberMemberMemberMember
Total Posts:  27
France
Member is from France
Joined on: 2009-05-12

Lobsan Payat - 26 September 2007 04:47 AM

“What others do and do not do is not my concern,” said the Buddha. “What I do and do not do - that is my concern.”

Namaste all.

A Chan abbot went dressed in rags to the door of a rich man and was turned away with an empty bowl. So he returned in his formal robe of office and was invited in and served a sumptuous meal. Removing his robe and folding it, he placed it on front of the feast and departed with the words, “This meal is not for me; it is for the robe.”

Why did he do this? This is something I don’t understand. Why did he want/need to correct the rich man? Did he do this to correct/impress/humiliate the rich man or to make hi feel ashamed? Or is this just a story to teach us not to look at clothes?

Profile
 
 
Posted: March 03 2010 09:03 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 6 ]
Rank: Moderator
Yan Zhuo's Avatar
ModeratorModeratorModeratorModeratorModerator
Total Posts:  141
Joined on: 2006-03-17

Brother upro Amituofo.

This is not just a story. This is a Great Chan Teaching. We used to look the appearance and to make an opinion about someone.

For example, most people seeking a Great Master to tech them Wugong. If this Master is fat or old nobody wants him for his shifu.

We must use our heart to search for anything not our eyes.

You know why some Buddhist traditions have the almsgiving?

In Buddhism, giving of alms is the beginning of one’s journey to Nirvana. Chan Buddhists believe that giving, without seeking something in return, leads to greater spiritual wealth and reduces acquisitive impulses that ultimately lead to further suffering.

In Buddhism, alms or almsgiving is the respect given by a lay Buddhist to a Buddhist monk, nun, spiritually-developed person or other sentient being. It is not charity as presumed by Western interpreters. The act of alms giving assists in connecting the human to the monk or nun and what he/she represents.

That is what the Venerable Master wishes to teach the rich man. Humbleness and respect. Unattached and unconditional generosity, giving and letting go.

May Lord Buddha bless us all.

Namo Amituofo _/\_

 Signature 

Understanding of Chan: Some years ago, before I began the study of Chan, I said,  ‘All is illusion’ , ‘The world is delusion.’ After I got insight into the truth of Chan through the instructions of my Master, I said,  ‘All is not an illusion’ , ‘The world is not a delusion.’ But now I say,  ‘All is realy an illusion’ , ‘The world is really a delusion.’ But then I ask: ‘Are the three understandings the same or different?’

“Awakening to the fact that there is nothing to awaken to is to see the Buddha Nature.”

Profile
 
 
Posted: March 03 2010 09:56 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 7 ]
Rank: Member
MemberMemberMemberMember
Total Posts:  27
France
Member is from France
Joined on: 2009-05-12

Amituofo Venerable Yan Zhuo,

so he corrected him in oder to show him that he was wrong? In order to help him find the right way? But the rich man obviously didn’t follow that way! Are you supposed to act like this, i. e. teach the people you meet withouit they asking for being taught?

Yan Zhuo - 03 March 2010 09:03 PM

Brother upro Amituofo.

This is not just a story. This is a Great Chan Teaching. We used to look the appearance and to make an opinion about someone.

For example, most people seeking a Great Master to tech them Wugong. If this Master is fat or old nobody wants him for his shifu.

We must use our heart to search for anything not our eyes.

You know why some Buddhist traditions have the almsgiving?

In Buddhism, giving of alms is the beginning of one’s journey to Nirvana. Chan Buddhists believe that giving, without seeking something in return, leads to greater spiritual wealth and reduces acquisitive impulses that ultimately lead to further suffering.

In Buddhism, alms or almsgiving is the respect given by a lay Buddhist to a Buddhist monk, nun, spiritually-developed person or other sentient being. It is not charity as presumed by Western interpreters. The act of alms giving assists in connecting the human to the monk or nun and what he/she represents.

That is what the Venerable Master wishes to teach the rich man. Humbleness and respect. Unattached and unconditional generosity, giving and letting go.

May Lord Buddha bless us all.

Namo Amituofo _/\_

Profile
 
 
Posted: March 03 2010 10:23 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 8 ]
Rank: Moderator
Yan Zhuo's Avatar
ModeratorModeratorModeratorModeratorModerator
Total Posts:  141
Joined on: 2006-03-17

upro - 03 March 2010 09:56 PM

teach the people you meet withouit they asking for being taught?

Namo Amituofo brother.


This is the way of the Masters. This is how it must be done.

And believe me this is the most hard thing to do in the World.

Namo Amituofo _/\_

 Signature 

Understanding of Chan: Some years ago, before I began the study of Chan, I said,  ‘All is illusion’ , ‘The world is delusion.’ After I got insight into the truth of Chan through the instructions of my Master, I said,  ‘All is not an illusion’ , ‘The world is not a delusion.’ But now I say,  ‘All is realy an illusion’ , ‘The world is really a delusion.’ But then I ask: ‘Are the three understandings the same or different?’

“Awakening to the fact that there is nothing to awaken to is to see the Buddha Nature.”

Profile
 
 
Posted: March 03 2010 10:34 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 9 ]
Rank: Member
MemberMemberMemberMember
Total Posts:  27
France
Member is from France
Joined on: 2009-05-12

Thank you very much!
Excuse me please if I ask it again, just to assure that I get it really right: The way of the master is to approach everyone who deos something which is not good and to correct him? If the master walks on the street and sees soeone doing something bad he goes to see him and tells him that he did something bad?

Sorry for asking again and again, I would like to understand this entirely!

Yan Zhuo - 03 March 2010 10:23 PM
upro - 03 March 2010 09:56 PM

teach the people you meet withouit they asking for being taught?

Namo Amituofo brother.


This is the way of the Masters. This is how it must be done.

And believe me this is the most hard thing to do in the World.

Namo Amituofo _/\_

Profile
 
 
Posted: March 03 2010 10:56 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 10 ]
Rank: Moderator
Yan Zhuo's Avatar
ModeratorModeratorModeratorModeratorModerator
Total Posts:  141
Joined on: 2006-03-17

Namo Amituofo brother.

There is nothing to forgive.

Everybody has the Buddha nature and Buddha qualities from which you can learn. So try to find something interesting in everybody you meet. If this is difficult, think of something you like about them. If this does not work, be grateful to them for teaching you patience.

Brother, remember cause and effect. If an enemy provokes us, we should know that they are creating bad Karma for themselves, which will surely return to them. Instead of getting involved and creating even more negativity, we can feel empathy towards them.

The only antidote to anger is patience, a quality one definitely requires to effectively work with the mind. Without enemies or difficult situations, there would be no chance to develop patience, and without patience, there would be no enlightenment. Therefore, we should try to be thankful for these opportunities. Reacting without anger to whatever appears will set free the timeless wisdom of body, speech, and mind.

Namo Amituofo _/\_

 Signature 

Understanding of Chan: Some years ago, before I began the study of Chan, I said,  ‘All is illusion’ , ‘The world is delusion.’ After I got insight into the truth of Chan through the instructions of my Master, I said,  ‘All is not an illusion’ , ‘The world is not a delusion.’ But now I say,  ‘All is realy an illusion’ , ‘The world is really a delusion.’ But then I ask: ‘Are the three understandings the same or different?’

“Awakening to the fact that there is nothing to awaken to is to see the Buddha Nature.”

Profile
 
 
   
1 of 2
1